In The Once And Future King, The Portrayal Of The Middle Ages Is Conce

In The Once and Future King, the portrayal of the Middle Ages is conceived as that of magnificent castles, beautiful clothing, great kings and queens- everything and everyone perfect. No proof of the dirty, unjust, horrible circumstances that all people lived by- even the nobility- existed throughout the entire novel. The people and places in The Once and Future King are so backward that the story could be described as a fairy tale. Camelot, for one, would not have been so gorgeously described, and looked upon as a majestic land. Towns back then were not pretty. Dirt thrived in cities; there were diseases and crud everywhere. Camelot was also depicted as being in order, and just to everyone. Communities during the Middle Ages were not orderly. They were probably outright chaotic and unjust. As far as the king goes, he probably did not do much to help the fairness of towns. Arthur, such a great, benevolent king, would not have existed back then. A great king no doubt probably came to reign a time or two but someone who was so great, and did so many things for his kingdom and so influential would not have been formed back then. Kings during the time of The Once and Future King were mostly insane, or cruel, or just should never have been remembered. No king ever did so many things that they would have stood out so much as Arthur would have. As a queen, Guenevere, from The Once and Future King, did not fit the stereotypical-Middle-Age queen. She did not want to marry the king because she did not know him. That does not sound so absurd now-a-days, but back then if someone did not want to marry the king, you were thought of being just as crazy as the king could have been. Given the chance to marry into royalty and live, as close to as you could, easily, you would jump at it in a second. Guenevere was emotional, and had feelings, something many queens did not tolerate. The knight was even portrayed in a dreamland way. Lancelot, such a great fighter, so brave, fair and content on doing the right thing; not many knights were like that. Lancelot lived so easily, could get away with anything, and would fight for anyone (as long as it was for the well-being of someone "good"). Nonfictional knights of the Middle Ages were not full of such valor, they just got the title, and fought. All blood and gore, no fancy romantic, picturesque life. It was dirty, and not always so ideal. As obvious as this is, it should be pointed out. The Once and Future King contained a magician, as wonderful as Merlyn is, and knowing that the story could not have taken place without him-he could not have existed. He brings out a spark in legends though, something that adds on to the fairy tale part. But, unfortunately, reality just swipes him away. In The Once and Future King there is a great part that elaborates on the knights of the Round Table. The elaboration brings out the untruth of it. There may have been a few well-behaved knights during the actual Middle Ages, but not enough to create a "club" and be so influential that the entire kingdom knew of you. Most knights were feared, not desired. The knights, in reality, went around to towns pillaging and raping-basically destroying anything and everything. The novel places knights in this innocence picture, a beautiful, yet completely absurd representation. All in all The Once and Future King is basically fabricated out of nothing, although the authors did a very nice job of creating a fairy tale out of a horrendous time. Most people like to pretend that the early Middle ages were great, but facing reality, you just can not believe it. Too much dirt, too much violence, all fighting, no love and beauty. The time period can sprout love and beauty, given the right amount of spice, though. As The Once and Future King did. Bibliography The Once and Future King, T.H. White

Value Added Tax Essays

Value Added Tax Essays Value Added Tax Essay Value Added Tax Essay Value added tax (VAT) in theory avoids the cascade effect of sales tax by taxing only the value added at each stage of production. For this reason, throughout the world, VAT has been gaining favour over traditional sales taxes. In principle, VAT applies to all provisions of goods and services. VAT is assessed and collected on the value of goods or services that have been provided every time there is a transaction (sale/purchase). The seller charges VAT to the buyer, and the seller pays this VAT to the government. If, however, the purchaser is not an end user, but the goods or services purchased are costs to its business, the tax it has paid for such purchases can be deducted from the tax it charges to its customers. The government only receives the difference; in other words, it is paid tax on the gross margin of each transaction, by each participant in the sales chain. In many developing countries such as India, sales tax/VAT are key revenue sources as high unemployment and low per capita income render other income sources inadequate. However, there is strong opposition to this by many sub-national governments as it leads to an overall reduction in the revenue they collect as well as a loss of some autonomy. In theory sales tax is normally charged on end users (consumers). The VAT mechanism means that the end-user tax is the same as it would be with a sales tax. The main difference is the extra accounting required by those in the middle of the supply chain; this disadvantage of VAT is balanced by application of the same tax to each member of the production chain regardless of its position in it and the position of its customers, reducing the effort required to check and certify their status. When the VAT system has few, if any, exemptions such as with GST in New Zealand, payment of VAT is even simpler.